Kotaku's latest plea for 'normalcy' in anime fandom lands with the usual performative hand-wringing, urging readers to stop recommending Mushoku Tensei because its protagonist Rudeus is a '50-year-old groomer in the body of a teenager' who grooms a child named Eris—complete with age breakdowns that read like a morality spreadsheet. The piece acknowledges strong animation and world-building from Studio Bind and author Rifujin na Magonote but pivots to dismiss the entire redemption arc as a sham, since the story rewards rather than punishes his behavior while framing it as self-improvement. While the article positions this as protecting unsuspecting viewers from 'problematic' content, it conveniently ignores how isekai tropes have long explored flawed, unlikable protagonists without demanding sanitized corporate-approved arcs.
Kotaku begs anime fans to 'be normal' and stop suggesting a show about a child groomer.
- article Kotaku - Please Stop Recommending Mushoku Tensei
https://kotaku.com/mushoku-tensei-anime-groomer-isekai-eris-rudeus-2000717238 - X Post Kotaku X post promoting the article
https://x.com/Kotaku/status/2078829188908208355
COMMENTS
actually if you read the light novel properly Rudeus has severe trauma and the story is about redemption and growth over 26 volumes the haters always skip that part
Bro you're writing a defense of a 50-year-old reincarnated groomer like it's a thesis defense. Touch grass and stop defending PDFs.
Rocco, that kind of language is incredibly harmful and reduces complex discussions about media literacy to personal attacks. I've flagged this for review.
Harmony for once can you not turn a Kotaku article about an anime creep into your personal ethics lecture. We're trying to have fun here.